Posts Tagged ‘tour de france’

Postscript

29/07/2017

No posts for a while as I’ve been pre-occupied, but now Le Tour is well and truly over again for another year, I shall endeavour to scribble more frequently.  Before I shift to another topic, I wanted to add a simple postscript to the last entry.  I had one (fairly) detailed response, and this whole cheating conundrum has been playing on my mind ever since.

Look at it this way.  Today, and for countless years previously, pretty much any story about Le Tour de France in particular, and professional cycling in general, is prefaced with something or other about doping, (and now it’s Jiffy bags).  Something or other about actual, perceived or suspected doping.  Fair enough.  Pro cyclists only have themselves to blame.  Why, oh why didn’t Team Sky simply come clean on the Jiffy bag?  It stinks.  However, my issue – and my point – is not centred on this.  The response to which I refer above, effectively continued the ‘all cyclists cheat’ mantra, thereby bolstering all the associated negative undertones, while simultaneously condoning the fact that ‘all footballers cheat’ and confirming that nobody really cares.  This is the crux of my bemusement over our double standards.  Imagine if every story about X football team were prefaced with a reminder that they only won the FA Cup in 20XX because their striker Y feigned injury in the penalty area in the 94th minute.  Perhaps they’d also managed to have their opponents’ top defender sent off following a bit of devious play-acting in the 13th minute (evidence of which was there for all to see on the video replay).  This kind of stuff is routine.  This is cheating.  We are collectively fine with that.  Indeed, we applaud it.  It’s bloody weird.  Well, I think it’s bloody weird.

Anyway, for a fascinating insight into the world of doping in the pro peloton, this is well worth a listen.  It adds some wonderful, thought-provoking context, the like of which I’ve not heard before.

 

Advertisements

It’s Not Only the French…

06/03/2014

Regular readers will know that I take a certain amount of perverse pleasure from posting images of Carrefour’s typos.  I am very happy to report that they are in good company.  Here’s one from our Trans-Atlantic cousins:

Image

Crap photo (sorry about that) of a massive ad’ in the local Costco.  I think it could even be an Aussie wine, so bonus points to me for a real international find.

Actually, the French have come up trumps again.  There’s a new Decathlon superstore somewhere on this glorious island.  I know this as an advertising flyer arrived in our post box the other day and this caught my eye:

Image

I’ve no doubt that this would find a niche market, somewhere on this here Internet.

Taking a slight tangent with this one, as there’s nothing wrong with it – it just tickled me.  Teenage boys will also be giggling, I have no doubt.

Image

I’ll end on my favourite topic.  Cycling is about to hit town as the Tour de Taiwan 2014 kicks off in a few days.  I happened to be browsing the website and clicked the ‘translate’ option.  I think the Gusto Team may struggle (you may need to click on the image to appreciate this one):

Image

There are no top tunes about the Tour de Taiwan, so you’ll have to make do with this:

Be Carrefour What you Wishfour

23/09/2013

Some time ago, I posted a few images of things that tickle me out here.  I’ve gathered several more, so it’s time they were unleashed upon the world.  As ever, I’m not intent on mocking; indeed, as ever, I’m eternally grateful that any English is on display at all in/on shops, on the roads, at museums and galleries.  Without it, I’d really struggle.

We have a Carrefour just around the corner, so I spend quite a lot of time in there.  It’s a good place to watch out for this kind of thing:

Image

This also made me smile, since I thought the general idea was to try to eliminate MSG, not seek it out:

Image

I’m happy to support Carrefour as they are a major sponsor of the Tour de France.  Christopher is happy to support Carrefour as they provide shopping trolleys for his level of car obsession:

Image

Milk here is pretty expensive.  You’d think they’d spend some of the profits on employing a proofreader:

Image

To give this a bit of balance, now is a good point to shift and assert that it’s not only the French getting their Ps & Qs in a muddle.  A couple of doors away is a branch of that stalwart of British DIY superstores, B&Q.  It’s much more of a giggle here:

Image

I saw this next one and was reminded of a dreadful old joke. Why are there so many Chinese people living in a certain town, home of a famous public school, just north west of Wembley?  Why?  Because they arrive at Heathrow, jump in a cab and say “Harrow Mr Taxi Driver.”

Image

Apologies if anyone finds that offensive.

At Ming’s new University, (National Cheng Kung University, since you ask) I came across the best lavatory sign I’ve ever seen, coupled with the wackiest urinals:

Image

Image

There must be a gag in there about taking a leek (or something), but I’m struggling, so fill in the gap for yourself if you’re feeling inspired.  I was, however, rather thrilled that the one and only Mr David Gedge recently re-tweeted the ‘busting for a pee’ pic, so I’ll take that as justification for throwing this in to enrich your lives.  A glorious, wonderful tune, and the only record I have ever pre-ordered:

Back to my favourite area, the permanent, rich vein of typos found anywhere, any time, with this classic from a mall boutique (inspired by Harold Steptoe, mefinks):

Image

Meanwhile, I am constantly amazed and amused by the mix of cultures on display, often in the most unlikely of places.  We went out for a drive a couple of months ago and stumbled across this large temple:

Image

A billion brownie points to anyone who can guess what was on display inside.  Toaist religious relics?  Ancient calligraphy?  Fresh local produce, perhaps, à la Harvest Festival?  How about some knitting and embroidery from the local equivalent of the WI?  Okay, what about a skip load of fireworks?

Not even close.  ‘ave this, oh ye of little imagination:

Image

There’s obviously so much more significance to Iron Man than you or I could ever conceive.

Since I’ve struck on something of a philosophical vibe, I’ll leave you with this to ponder.  Answers on a postcard, please:

Image

My Twenty One Year Love Affair with the Tour de France

24/10/2012

Here’s something I drafted during this year’s Tour.  I wondered about publishing it and hesitated, then I procrastinated, then I hesitated some more.  In view of recent developments, and inspired by today’s presentation of the 2013 Tour route, I think it’s now time to go public.

Back in the dark ages of the last century, I stumbled across cycle racing on Channel 4.  It was 1991 and Miguel Indurain was destined to win the first of his five Tours de France; I’d never heard of Indurain, nor any of the other protagonists of that Tour, but from the first instalment of the daily highlights I was hooked.  Twenty one years later, as I watch the beginning of my 22nd Tour, I’m still utterly fascinated by the race.  Here are some musings on what this event has meant to me and how it has shaped my life to a greater or lesser extent since that one remarkable, memorable summer.

I’d always enjoyed cycling and fiddling with bikes, from the time I was given my first machine (a Puch with a weird split and curved top tube) when I was about nine or ten years old.  Then, one year, when I was about 16, I bought an old Falcon racer (from a police auction in Gosport) which I sprayed dark green with one of those cans of paint you can buy to touch up your car.  In spite of this general interest, I don’t recall having any desire to use a bike for anything other than leisure; the thought of wearing cycling shorts – Lycra or otherwise – would have been inconceivable.  I knew the name Eddy Merckx, but that was the limit of my knowledge of cycling as a sport.  Cycling was rarely on the television, if ever, and I didn’t get to see cycling magazines, nor do I recall ever seeing groups of cyclists on training rides.  It was a sport which happened on the Continent and had no place in the south of England, as far as I was aware.

One day in 1982, a new television channel was launched in the UK.  Little did I know, as I sat mesmerised by Whiteley’s gentle charm and Vorderman’s voluptuous mathematical geekiness, that this wilfully radical broadcaster would ultimately have so much influence on my life.  Although their coverage of the Tour began in 1986, to my eternal chagrin I failed to take notice of Channel 4’s exposure of the race until a number of years later.  I must have been doing other things; I was certainly playing a lot of cricket at the time.  Ironically, it was the channel’s desire to concentrate on test cricket which brought about the demise of their coverage in 2001 – naturally, I was outraged, both by the loss of test cricket from the BBC and by the realisation that the wonderful Tour de France theme tune would be consigned to the scrapheap.  Legend has it (okay, Goooogle has it) that the tune was composed by Pete Shelley, he of Buzzcocks fame, but it remains unavailable commercially as far as I am aware.

By chance, 1986 was a momentous year in Tour history.  I’ve recently finished Richard Moore’s compelling story of that year’s race, Slaying the Badger, and thanks to his detailed description of the way the race unfolded, I feel even more aggrieved that I did not witness the events on television.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Slaying-Badger-LeMond-Hinault-Greatest/dp/0224082914  (If you buy a copy, see if you can spot the reversed photo)

Greg LeMond became the first winner from the English speaking world; furthermore, it was a significant moment for the French since, as of 2012, Bernard Hinault, the titular Badger, remains the last Frenchman to win the race (in 1985).  That Tour had huge amounts of drama and intrigue, not to mention the episode of LeMond’s upset stomach and the relief he found on a makeshift lavatory made from some 40,000 postcards of Monsieur Hinault.

I eventually had my first taste of the Tour in the summer of 1991, just after my 29th birthday.  In truth, I don’t remember too much about the race itself; I remember a few of the names (Millar, Bugno, Chiappucci) but most of all, I remember the Tashkent Terror, Djamolidine Abdoujaparov, who was the sprint star of the day.  I can’t say I have any recollection of LeMond in that year’s race (in which he finished 7th), or any other for that matter, which is less surprising as he failed to complete the Tour in ‘92 and ‘94.  One piece of information clearly made an impression on me, and I will still tell anyone who’s interested that Miguel Indurain had a resting heart rate of 28 beats per minute.  At the time I thought that was unbelievable; mine is now 48.  Aside from these minor details, the main memory I have is simply one of the whole spectacle of the race.  So many riders, so many vehicles, so much colour, so many roadside fans (especially on the climbs), so many crashes, so many riders winning stages but Indurain winning the General Classification.  What on earth was going on?  How could these men ride so far, day after day?  Why did the riders in the inevitable daily breaks almost never survive to win the stage?  Clearly, there was much to learn.  I watched every moment of the television coverage, determined to soak up whatever information Liggett and Sherwen – the Hinge and Brackett of cycling commentary – could impart.  One thing remained, if not exactly a mystery, at least incomprehensible to my little mind until many years later: the effect of drafting.  I finally experienced riding in a large group of road cyclists in 2002 when I joined the Loughborough Students’ Wednesday afternoon training ride.  A 60 mile ride was not only possible, it was positively comfortable, when compared to riding 40 or 50 miles solo.  The benefit of ‘sitting on a wheel’ was truly a revelation and by the end of my first race in the summer of 2003, I began to appreciate the magical power of the peloton.  My legs and lungs were far more capable than I had ever imagined.

Meanwhile, back in 1991, after three weeks, the Tour ended and cycling disappeared from my life again.  Why I didn’t act on my undoubted enthusiasm, I really don’t know.  I still had the old Falcon, but it wasn’t until the following June that I took it into A Hole’s (honestly!) bike shop in Burgess Hill and part-exchanged it for a Dawes hybrid, resplendent in its bright orange paintwork, 18 speeds and knobbly, narrow tyres.  It was a gift to myself for my 30th birthday.  Again, why I didn’t go for a racing bike, I don’t know.  Mountain biking was becoming incredibly popular, but I knew little about that either, so I guess I plumped for something in between.  Cycling shorts were still not even close to finding a place on the agenda, but I did start to ride fairly regularly, albeit for what now seem like pitifully short rides; 30 minutes maximum.  Perhaps my arse couldn’t take any more than that, on a cheap saddle with nothing like a chamois to cushion the pain.

Fast forward to 1994.  If you have a basic geographical knowledge of the UK, you’ll know that Burgess Hill sits in West Sussex, perhaps 12 miles north of Brighton and, even better, just five miles from Ditchling Beacon.  Furthermore, if you know me, you’ll be aware that I was born in Gosport, where my parents still lived in 1994.  If you don’t know me, trust me when I tell you that I was born in Gosport, which is a stone’s throw from Portsmouth, from where a Tour stage started (and finished, I think) that year.  In spite of the above, I failed to see any of the Tour when it came to the south of England that summer.  Once again, I have no idea why.  I remember watching the television coverage and I particularly remember Sean Yates being allowed the privilege of stopping to greet his family, somewhere not very far from where I lived.  I must have been at work and would have been unaware of the Tour route until coverage began so would have been unable to get time off at short notice.  That must be the reason.  I don’t think the Internet was present in our lives then, and even if it was, I doubt Gooooogle was around to help.  Geeks and nerds, feel free to correct this, but suffice to say that I had little, if any, knowledge or experience of gathering information on a computer about some foreign cycle race.  I have often heard the expression that it is better to regret something that you did than to regret something that you didn’t do.  I really regret not getting myself on the route of one of the two stages to grace our shores that year to witness the race first-hand.  Looking back, the Tour de France was something that happened on the television; I don’t think it had actually occurred to me that it was real and that it was criss-crossing Kent, Sussex and Hampshire.  I was still playing lots of cricket that summer and cycling was merely a curiosity.  It certainly had never occurred to me that I would one day get to race against young men (and women) who would go on to race in the professional ranks, but more of this later.

A final word on 1994; it was the year of ‘that’ crash.  You know, the one with the gendarme taking a photograph.  I remember thinking at the time that it was amazing that nobody was killed; just the thought of it still turns my stomach and I reckon it still tempers the way that I ride and race.

Undoubtedly there are some really hard men in cycling, and crashes are commonplace on the professional racing circuit, not least in the first week of any of the Grand Tours.  As a consequence of what I’ve seen cyclists go through – think Johnny Hoogerland, Tour de France 2011 as a prime example – I find it all but impossible to watch football any more, as explained here:

https://fiftyyearsandcounting.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/why-i-cant-watch-football-any-more-17-2/

The example set by so many of the footballers in our so-called Premier League is appalling.  Some of the feigned injury antics are an embarrassment and I fail to understand why the football authorities do nothing about it, in spite of the high quality video evidence which is usually available.  Anyway, I digress.  Back to the important stuff.

Big Mig’ made it five wins in a row in 1995, then disappeared off the scene after cracking (a brutal cycling term!) the following year.  There followed a three year period when the Tour was claimed by three different men: Riis, Ullrich and Pantani; this period was, for me, something of a lull before the storm of the Armstrong era, although it must be remembered that 1998 also saw the race reach probably the lowest point in its troubled history when the Festina drugs scandal broke.  I think that, up until that point, I was willing to believe that there was doping in the peloton, but that it was only practised by a number of renegade chancers.  Evidently, I was somewhat naïve in this belief.  I’m not really interested in regurgitating the arguments and the history of doping in cycling; just about anyone will tell you that cyclists take drugs, and hearing this from those who have no other knowledge of the sport is rather tiresome.  I find it interesting that other sports don’t attract the same level of media attention about the use of performance enhancing drugs.  Whatever the public perception, I’m prepared to believe that the sport is now cleaner than it has ever been.  It is certainly the most tested sport, as far as I am aware.

In spite of my reluctance to give the subject yet more attention, I feel that there are a couple of observations on the subject that warrant an airing.  I recently read about Jacques Anquetil’s take on the use of drugs in the professional peloton, and while I would never condone drug use in any form, his justification (if that is the correct term) of the practice does suggest that it is possible to look at the situation from a different perspective.  As I understand it, Anquetil was unhappy with the way cyclists were being treated; he explained that cycling was his job, through which he made his living and in which he had a relatively short time period to make as much money as possible.  He then compared this to other professions, complaining that (for example) in the world of finance, the likes of a city trader would not be tested for the use of amphetamines or other substances which s/he may well be using to improve his or her performance in the business of making money.  Why should professional sportsmen be any different?  The argument is a little flimsy, if I have accurately summarised the gist of his statement, but it does suggest that we are rather inconsistent in our definition of what is right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable.  After all, sport is one aspect of the entertainment business.  Would we take such a dim view of an actor, singer or comedian taking drugs to heighten their performances?

The other drug-related curiosity in cycling has a direct connection to one of Britain’s best-loved riders.  Tom Simpson died on Mont Ventoux during the 1967 Tour de France.  It is common knowledge that he had amphetamines in his system when he died; I believe he may even have had some pills in his cycling jersey at the time.  This in itself is not especially noteworthy.  What I find curious is that Tom Simpson retains the love and admiration of the cycling community; I’ve yet to meet another cyclist who has a bad word to say about Simpson, in spite of the widely-known facts surrounding his untimely death at the tender age of just 29 years.  There is a monument on the mountain to mark the place where he died; it is common practice for cyclists to leave offerings at this shrine to the man who put British cycling on the map.  I was in a café a few weeks ago and one old bike rider took great delight in telling me that he’d ridden up Ventoux recently, that he’d taken time to stop to pay his respects, and that he had left one of his club caps at the foot of the monument among so many other items of clothing, bidons and general cycling paraphernalia.  It is apparent that countless people do the same kind of thing every year.  The love and respect for Tom Simpson is incredibly touching, and the fact that he died with drugs in his system seems to be of no consequence.  I suspect that this is because he was simply doing what all of his other contemporaries were doing, and in that sense the playing field was relatively level.  He was undoubtedly an exceptional cyclist who was admired by fellow professionals and cycling fans alike.  He was a great ambassador for British cycling.  Drugs were an occupational hazard.

In 1999, cycling changed forever with the dawning of the Armstrong era.  I remember being in awe of this American who took control of the Tour that first year, while I marvelled at his high cadence time trialling and climbing.  Armstrong’s grip on the race was certainly impressive.  I had no reason to doubt his prowess at the time as I didn’t see how an individual with his medical history would want to prejudice his remarkable story of recovery through any form of illicit activity.  As things stand today, Armstrong remains at the centre of accusations about the use of drugs, but it is not something that bothers me. Frankly, I really don’t care whether he used PEDs or not.  I’ve since lost any respect I had for the man after I learned more about the history and antics of Lance Armstrong and his bully-boy tactics.  One particular incident, when he chased down Simeoni during the 2004 Tour was nothing more than the spiteful act of a playground bully, setting a shocking, unforgiveable example of the worst kind of sporting intimidation.  Surely, it was completely unnecessary.

Nevertheless, at the time of Armstrong’s maiden victory I was inspired to ride my ageing Dawes further and faster than ever before.  His follow-up victory in 2000 marks my own watershed moment on two wheels.  After quitting my job in banking, I went off to the USA to travel across and around the country for a while.  When in California I joined up with a small group of mountain bikers, hired a Marin for a couple of weeks and had a fantastic baptism of fire on the singletrack trails around Lake Tahoe, Marin County and Santa Cruz.  While I crashed aplenty, I found that I was fitter than I had imagined and that I really enjoyed pushing my body further than I thought possible.  I even bought some proper cycling shorts.  So, there it was.  I’d played my last game of cricket in the summer of 1998 and now I had been reborn as a cyclist.  Within a week of arriving back in Blighty I’d invested £1400 in my first mountain bike and I began to teach myself to use clipless pedals.  By chance, I then moved to Shropshire for a while, where I was close enough to make regular visits to Coed y Brenin to hone my mountain biking skills and work on my fitness, strength and endurance.

By the time Armstrong had chalked-up his third win, I’d enrolled at Loughborough University.  It soon became obvious that there are few mountains in north Leicestershire, so I found myself researching road bikes and decided it was time to treat myself again, and my 40th birthday was fast approaching.  After several visits to John Fern’s cycle shop in Coalville, I opted for a second-hand Olagnero frameset in purple, which John built up with a Campagnolo groupset and red Mavic rims, finished off with Cinelli bars and a pair of yellow Time pedals.  Not exactly the best colour combination, but undoubtedly unique.  I was very proud of my first proper race bike.  Sadly, the frame only lasted a year.  I hit a pothole and snapped the chain-stay, but it was difficult to feel annoyed about it; that same week I learnt that John had hanged himself in the back of his shop.  I didn’t know him well, but I liked visiting the shop and picking his brains on all things bike-related.  Perhaps he seemed a little world-weary, but in terms of cycling he was certainly full of life and in good humour and news of his untimely death came as real shock.

In October 2002 I ventured out on my first club ride with the students in Loughborough, as described above.  By spring of the following year I had ridden out to watch my first couple of road races – The Metaltek Grand Prix on the Harby circuit, and the Coalville Wheelers’ race at Griffydam – and then I had my first look at circuit racing when I went to support a few of the students racing at Darley Moor.  A few weeks later and I was mixing it with approximately 100 other riders in my maiden road race at Mallory Park, just days before my 41st birthday.  I finished in the bunch, not having the legs to take any part in the sprint, but the result was far better than I had expected.  That night I couldn’t sleep until the very early hours; it felt like my whole body was fizzing with a heady mix of adrenaline and endorphins.  I knew I had to race again, but I also knew that I would never watch bike racing in the same way again.  Since then, I have raced at Mallory countless times, as well as in several road races.  My proudest moment was finishing the BUSA road race, sprinting for about 20th place after 130kms on a testing, hilly circuit near Alcester.  I should point out that it was at Mallory that I raced against the likes of Dan Martin, Adam Blythe and Lucy Garner.  Meanwhile, in the BUSA time trials, I remember beating Emma Pooley on at least one occasion.  *Cough*:

Beating Emma Pooley by 29 seconds

I mention these names, not to suggest that I am worthy of special praise, but to illustrate how cycling has a relatively small circle of participants and how it remains open to riders of all levels.  By contrast, I don’t recall crossing the path of any future cricket stars during my time in whites.  (Actually, there is one exception: I was at school with Don Topley and I played with and against this future Essex stalwart in the late 1970s.  Don is perhaps best remembered for taking an exceptional one-handed catch off Malcolm Marshall during a Test match at Lords while on the field as a substitute fielder.  Unfortunately, after taking the catch, he stepped over the boundary rope.  Close, but no cigar.)  Another part of cycling which reinforces this close, but not closed, community spirit is that I have trained and raced with people who have raced against some of the biggest names in the sport.  My good friend (and occasional training partner) Jeroen Janssen rides for Team Raleigh; last year he took part in the Tour of Britain alongside the likes of Cavendish and Renshaw.  However, the Swede, Magnus Backstedt, is probably the best example of the phenomenon, because the former Paris-Roubaix winner and Tour de France stage winner is now prominent on the domestic road scene in the UK, racing against several people I know.  Can you imagine a top ex-professional footballer playing in the minor leagues in the twilight of his career?

By the time the Texan had won his seventh Tour, it is fair to say that my enthusiasm had waned.  Perhaps it was the seven year itch; perhaps it was the utter domination and control exercised by Team Armstrong, both on the road and in the media.  Frankly, the Tour had become rather dull and by 2005 it was evident that the American was dividing opinion like never before.  I think many people would have preferred that after he retired he would simply fade away into the background.  However, one unremarkable come-back Tour in 2009 and on-going allegations and counter allegations about doping suggest that he will stay in the headlines for some time to come.

The post-Armstrong era has been uncomfortable.  The names of Landis, Rasmussen, Contador and Vinokourov, among far too many others, have been indelibly linked with drug scandals.  Sadly, the pragmatist in me tended to think “well, they’re all at it” while admitting that the racing was entertaining, so what was the problem?  This is a tough race and the rewards can be highly lucrative, so I am no longer surprised by allegations of cheating.  Indeed, back in the early years of the event, riders were found on occasion to have taken the train to save their legs.  Bike racers – they’re only human.  I’ve never seen myself as an optimist, but the signs are there that this year’s race is as clean as it has (ever?) been, as witnessed in the lower power outputs being recorded in the racers’ data.  Meanwhile, Wiggins and Sky are shouting from the rooftops about their anti-doping policy and stance, although the sceptic in me wonders at the potential for something under the Murdoch Empire becoming entwined in immoral, illegal, ungentlemanly or unsportsmanlike behaviour.  Surely, that would never happen.

I recently celebrated my fiftieth birthday, but I still ride as often as domestic commitments allow.  Although the house is still half full of bikes, bits for bikes, wheels, jerseys and shorts, the available space is now being challenged by boxes full of children’s toys.  I now have a son of seventeen months, so any thoughts of selling-off old equipment have long disappeared.  I have no idea if Christopher will show any interest in my passion, but at least the bikes will be around for him to study, should he choose to explore the same.  I’d love him to share my enthusiasm for the sport, but part of me hopes that he’ll choose something less hazardous.

This brings me to the final chapter in my story.  As Bradley Wiggins looks set to become the first Briton to win a Grand Tour, cycling is making more and more of an impact on the collective British psyche.  There’s still a long way to go in the quest to have it reach the level of support it enjoys on the Continent, where it’s certainly not viewed as a fringe sport.  Undoubtedly, there are many more leisure cyclists on our roads, lanes, trails and cycle paths, and there are many more men and women training and racing. The fact remains, however, that cyclists are often seen as a nuisance; more worryingly, they are often seen as fair game for selfish, impatient and aggressive drivers.  Which of us can say that they’ve never been threatened or abused by motorists?  The more time I spend on the road, the more I fear for my safety and the safety of fellow riders.  Clearly, there are many people on bikes who wilfully flout the rules of the road, but this does not justify the often life-threatening behaviour displayed by so many drivers.  Without wishing to sound overly melodramatic, I’m pretty certain that cycling has saved my life by giving me a sense of focus, an outlet for my energy and the time to think about why I am here.  When I’ve been down and almost out, a bike ride has invariably brought me back from the brink; it’s also brought me into contact with countless like-minded people and it has now been the centre of my social life for many years.  Paradoxically, it has also put me in a really dangerous place more times than I care to remember.  So, as the 2012 Tour de France draws to an end and cycling fans across the country will drink a toast to Wiggins and his faithful team, I feel bound to campaign for a safer environment for all those future sprinters, testers, climbers and GC contenders who have yet to don their first pair of cycling shorts, and for those of us who plan to continue riding well into our retirement years.  I know road safety is not the sexiest of subjects, but I sincerely believe that most drivers simply don’t understand or appreciate what it takes to make a racing cyclist, so they need to be educated.  With the backing of British Cycling, the CTC and other interested parties, it must be possible to raise awareness, and who better to front the media campaign than the Sky Corporation?  It just needs some high-profile, charismatic interest to drive forward the funding applications.

I’d like to see the day when I can see my son off on a training ride without worrying unduly about him being hurt by some ignorant prat in an Audi.  Is that so much to ask?

I’m still in love with the Tour.  My love has matured, and I’ve come to understand and appreciate my mistress.  A little piece of me regrets that I didn’t meet her until it was too late to find out if I would ever have been good enough to really compete.  No matter.  She has made me very happy, and for the 49 weeks of the year when I cannot see her, at least I have something else to look forward to next summer.

Vive le Tour!

Nostalgia Ain’t What it Used to Be

17/07/2012

Ask anyone of a certain age what has changed since their childhood.  Most will say that you just don’t see white dog pooh any more.  This is probably a good thing.  Maybe it’s because dogs are eating different food, or perhaps it’s because something else has changed.  Back in the twentieth century, you didn’t tend to see owners following dogs around with polythene bags, ready to scoop the poop while still hot from the bot.  Today, although the situation is not perfect, there is probably less chance of stepping in a steaming turd while walking in the park or going to the local off licence.

Now, there’s a thing – the local off licence.  There used to be a little cubby hole in the boozer from where we could buy crisps and Mars Bars, or beer to take home.  We were that hard-up, one Mars Bar had to be shared between four of us back then, and the cutter of the bar was last to choose a slice, while the ends were quickly bagsed by those desiring a greater chocolate to caramel and nougat ratio, but I digress.  I remember trawling through the hedgerows and ditches to gather discarded glass bottles which we could take back to said cubby hole in return for a penny or two at a time.  Deposits on glass bottles seemed such a great idea.  It funded my Blackjack and Sherbet Fountain habit for several years.

Car seatbelts.  It’s not that long ago that seatbelts were seen as some kind of optional extra.  Seatbelts for passengers in the back seats were unheard of and babies and toddlers simply found themselves on mum’s lap or rolling around in the load area, if fortunate enough to be travelling in an estate car.  One day, along came Jimmy Savile telling us that we should belt up or die a hideous death; later, some bloke came along and told us that we could be killed by an elephant (or was it a rhino?) coming from the back seat and through the back of our heads.  Today, for those of us using motor vehicles, seatbelts are part of our daily lives.  We clip-up with nary a thought, while our children are strapped into their personal pseudo Recaro bucket seats like some kind of dribbling, puking rally driver.  Rest assured they will not be metamorphosing into Dumbo any time soon.

A more recent change in our lives was the banning of smoking in pubs.  Imagine suggesting to some leather-faced, yellow-fingered puffer back in 1975 that smokers should assuage their nicotine cravings outside the bar.  Unthinkable.  Surely, smoking in bars was a good thing?  I recall not recalling coming home after a heavy night out, but the following morning the primary evidence of beer-fuelled shenanigans was a festering pile of clothes simply oozing with the scent of countless Woodbines.  You know how smells are brilliant reminders of particular times and places?  Well, the stench of stale smoke on my favourite merino polar neck jumper was reminder enough to keep me out of the Red Lion for days, if not weeks to come.  Today, the only evidence of a heavy night in The Jolly Sophisticate, or some other equally pretentious watering hole, is the massive hole in the finances or the faint whiff of Chanel No.5 picked up from the back of the sofa in the snug, (darling).

The Labour Party used to be Socialist.  Now they are centre-left.  For some reason, Mars changed the name of the Marathon to Snickers.  That’s just nuts.  The Royal Mail used to deliver twice in a day.  How on earth do we manage now?  Homosexuality used to be illegal.  Mobile phones had batteries big enough to start a Mercedes.  Berlin had that wall.

*Bland statement warning*. Things change and we soon forget what it used to be like in the good old days.

Most things change for the better, although I could do without the shift towards so much American English tripping off the tongues of the great unwashed.  Can I get a coffee to numb the pain?  I am so totally not able to ignore such bolleaux.  Awesome.

I don’t really understand how things suddenly change and achieve an air of acceptability, credibility or popularity.  There are so many avenues allowing even the most quiet and unassuming members of society to communicate with the wider world, how is it possible to achieve a level of interest that becomes self-perpetuating in a genuinely good way?  Late last year, I remember seeing a Twitter campaign in which a man made a bet that he could reach 1 million followers by Christmas.  The bookmaker stood to lose £10,000, I think. The winnings had been pledged to charity, so it was not a simple get-rich-quick scheme devised by some chancer in a Soho basement.  In spite of several months of hounding and cajoling, begging and pleading, the campaign failed.  The #twager Tweeter failed even to reach 10,000 followers.  Now, I’m no mathematician, but I can see that if there were a successful retweet phenomenon in which everyone followed an instruction, the numbers could become huge in a matter of minutes.  That charity could have made ten grand in an instant.  Meanwhile, vacuous so-called celebrities such as Bieber, Gaga, Price and the rest have millions of simpering followers hanging on their every word.

Back to the nostalgia.  In 1962, Tom Simpson was the first British rider to don the maillot jaune of the Tour de France.  He never won the race.  Today, the jersey sits on the shoulders of the British rider, Bradley Wiggins.  With five stages remaining, there’s a good chance that Wiggins will achieve what no other British rider has done.  Those in the know are asserting that the race is now his to lose.  Cyclists from the black and white era of film and television will be beside themselves with excitement, remembering how Simpson was pictured as a British gentleman (bowler hat et al) and how Wiggins is now being labelled as a gentleman for his recent action in neutralising a stage to allow his rivals to recover after tack-driven puncture sabotage.

Wiggins didn’t become a great rider by sitting on his arse.  He covers thousands of miles on public roads, throughout the year, often fighting for space on strips of asphalt shared with countless fast-moving metal boxes.  If he does win the Tour, I hope this will mark the start of something new and we will be looking back in ten years, wondering why we ever viewed grown men and women in lycra as some kind of hindrance, or as fair game for our ignorant, selfish ranting and dangerous, unthinking behaviour.

Vive le Tour!  May 2012 mark the watershed in the populace of the UK becoming lovers of cycling as a sport as well as a pastime.

BBC 6Music – Why Listen to Anything Else?

10/07/2012

When I’m not on my bike or asleep or hanging out the washing, it’s pretty certain I’ll be listening to 6Music.  Unless it’s summer, when I could be tuning in to Test Match Special (TMS) or ITV4’s coverage of the Tour de France. (Today is a rest day across the Channel, so 6Music it is.)  http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/

I have a DAB radio in the kitchen, one in the living room and one in the bedroom, and I also have a rather nifty piece of kit which allows me to tune in while driving.  No more Ken Bruce or Steve Wright for me, thanks very much.  I know BBC 6Music is billed as a sister station to Radio 2, but it is simply the only music station I can listen to all day, every day, without becoming irritated.  It focuses on the music, not the presenters, although there was a slight glitch a few years back when they employed a clown (somebody Lamb) for a while.  Thankfully, his contract was not renewed and order returned to the digital airwaves.

I missed the first couple of months after the station went live in 2002, but I have rarely missed a day since then.  It’s been both a source of the best new and old music – what I would call ‘proper’ music – and the perfect antidote for the dreadful offerings of all those other stations whose staple is the kind of music which “says nothing to me about my life”.  On 6Music I can hear anything from a twenty minute Genesis track to a slice of Public Enemy via a classic Peel session track or a new release by the likes of Laura Marling or Public Service Broadcasting.  Presenters include current and former musicians (Riley, Robinson, Morgan, Laverne, Matthews, Cocker, et al) alongside seasoned broadcasting professionals (Coe, Maconie, Radcliffe, Lamacq, Collins, among others), but what binds them together is their obvious passion for the music.  There’s also some cutting edge comedy, inasmuch as radio can broadcast the same, in the shape of Jon Holmes and (periodically) Adam and Joe, while the station has also been home to the Russells (Brand and Howard), Jon Richardson, Stephen Merchant, Peter Serafinowicz and others.

I’ve had countless emails read out across the full range of shows and have even chatted with presenters on air on five separate occasions, and while I’m not usually one to self-aggrandize, it does illustrate that the shows are accessible and indicates that the listeners have some level of ownership.  At least, that’s how I feel.  Indeed, a couple of years ago, there was a well-publicised threat of closure hanging over the station, but the suits were persuaded to change their minds, largely as a result of a huge outpouring of love for 6 from the loyal band of listeners.  It also became evident that many of the world’s best musicians supported the campaign to save the station, thus reinforcing its credibility while not simply depending on some sort of vacuous celebrity endorsement to appease the decision makers.

Having loved the station for all these years, I really cannot contemplate life without it.  What I cannot understand is how the wider public at large are still being duped by the manufactured twaddle that is forced upon them by the likes of Cowell through so many unimaginative, formulaic shows on the television.  I’m sure I’m a dreadful music snob, but I really feel for the masses who don’t get to hear the likes of Field Music and Plank ! (to name but two of my favourites) simply because local commercial stations (not to mention other BBC stations) are feeding them a diet of mediocrity; so-called stars having their 15 minutes of fame, while creaming off more millions for men in trousers with high waistbands.  I’d heartily recommend that everyone open their minds and their ears and tune in to sample a little something by Billy Childish or The Fall or Stereolab or Everything Everything or The Smiths or Richard Hawley.  The list goes on.  There’s loads of stuff to try, the vast majority of which you just will not hear anywhere else.

Rather like my passion for pedalling, it’s still something of a fringe interest.  Listener numbers are increasing (as are cyclists), but there’s a long way to go before the ‘mainstream’ label may be applied.  In a way, I’d like both to remain fringe and exclusive, but I can see that a world with many more people sharing my love of proper music and cycling has to be something to be encouraged.

Help me out: try giving at least a week of your life to 6Music and at least a lifetime to giving me some space on the road.  Thanks.

Football is not worth watching

24/06/2012

During the Tour de France last year, this happened:

This was what resulted for Johnny Hoogerland, the one you see somersaulting into a barbed wire fence:

Sure enough, he went on to finish the stage (139th), and then the rest of the tour (74th).  This was on Stage nine, so there were nearly two more weeks of racing to follow.  Now, can you imagine a professional footballer in a similar situation?  Of course not, there are no cars on the pitch, rarely any barbed wire and the match only lasts for 90 minutes.  Is there a football match played these days in which you will not see one or more of these preening prima donnas rolling on the turf looking as of they’ve been shot?  It sickens me to see such overt play acting; it angers me that the football authorities do nothing about it.  Any fool can see that the vast majority of the injuries are feigned simply to gain an advantage.

There’s currently talk about the use of goal line technology.  I’d prefer to see the technology put to better use in ridding the sport of a bunch of cheating, overpaid gobshites.  I’d also like to see the managers show the players some video of some of cycling’s real hard men, to show their fragile little charges exactly what it’s like to get properly hurt during a game.  The disgraceful example shown to millions of young footballing wannabes is unforgivable.

While I’m at it, two more things spring to mind: 1: football should learn from rugby in order to reduce or eliminate the amount of back-chat aimed at referees – simply award a further 10 metres advantage and/or adopt the ‘sin bin’ system, and 2: Fergusson, he of the Manchester United variety, should learn to chew that revolting gum without displaying to the world at large, and to dispose of it nicely.  Knight of the realm, my arse.